| Please CLICK HERE to go to the updated guitar forum. This version is no longer active as a discussion area, but is still available as a searchable archive. All user names and passwords have been integrated in the new forum |
|
Acoustic Guitar Forum
![]() The IGS Guitar Forum
![]() Duolian/Triolian body - is there a difference ?
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Duolian/Triolian body - is there a difference ? |
|
snakehips Member Posts: 1042 From: Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K. Registered: Feb 2003 |
Hi there, I've got an old National steel bodied guitar with a replacement neck on it. The body has also been repainted. So how do I tell if it was a Duolian or a Triolian ? Do the old Duolian and Triolian bodies differ in any way ? I've heard that Triolians had thicker gauge steel and that Duolians tended to have whatever was available. Or are they actually the same ???(apart from original paint finish - which is not there any more on my guitar) ??? The guitar has a 12 fret body and flat-cut f-holes so would be circa 1929-1932 ? (has a non-ribbed coverplate) A 12 string neck was made for it in 1986 by Don Young (National Resophonic) when he still worked at DOBRO. I'm thinking of having the neck replaced for a Baritone neck (6 string of course - but a 12 string baritone might be very interesting !!!!!!!) Anyone out there know how to tell which of a Duolian/Triolian it is ? IP: Logged |
|
Scott Jacobs Moderator ![]() Posts: 3460 From: Port Charlotte, FL Registered: Apr 2001 |
snakehips, That sounds like a real interesting guitar. Hambone has something similar, I think. I'm not sure about the difference in the metals between the Triolians and the Duolians. I have heard similar claims that the metals were heavier in the Triolians but I don't know if this is always the case. I have picked up some 12 fret Triolians and have noted them to be definitely heavier than my '31 Duolian but then again I didn't weigh them. And then there's the differences in wood used. Nor did I take a magnet to the Triolians that I've played to see if they were made of anything other than steel. You appear to have it dated correctly as far as I can tell. I would like to add a question to your thread if I may? Were the paints used on the Triolians and Duolians lead based? [This message has been edited by Sherwin-Williams (edited March 03, 2003).] [This message has been edited by Scott Jacobs (edited March 03, 2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Russ Young Member Posts: 1687 From: Seattle, Washington USA Registered: Jan 2003 |
According to Bob Brozman's book (anybody who owns -- or wants -- a vintage National should have a copy!), the Duolian had a "slightly thinner gauge steel body." As for whether the paint is lead-based ... good question! IP: Logged |
|
snakehips Member Posts: 1042 From: Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K. Registered: Feb 2003 |
Hi again. Ah ha !!! Duolian paint ! I would think that lead must be in the paint. I presume that any health hazards for these paints would mainly be present during the painting process / aerosol formation etc etc. My guess is that the Duolian paints have different qualities depending whether top coat or undercoat. I think that the undercoat is applied and allowed to dry. Greasy fingers (but especially thumbs) are then applied to leave grease marks all over the guitar body. Just imagine thats how they might have found this paint finish, by accident, using unwashed hands to paint an early duolian ??? Surely this could be replicated with newer non-toxic materials ? IP: Logged |
|
Mike D Member ![]() Posts: 1393 From: Phx, Az Registered: Dec 2000 |
I've seen some Triolians with pretty thin body material. I'd imagine it was a bit of a crapshoot which models were made with which ga. of metal. There was even some occasional mixing of brass and steel in some guitars. As to the 'Frosted Duco' they didn't have to do anything so 'hands on' as to put thumbprints on the body. It was an industrial paint made to do that, similar to the 'krinkle' paints we have today. Supposedly Young and Gaines (from National R-P) sought out the original formula through patent searches but since they don't use it I'd guess it's no longer feasible due to modern safety and air quality standards. Powdercoating is also more durable, though IMO not as attractive. IP: Logged |
|
toremainn Member Posts: 806 From: Bodø, Norway Registered: Jan 2003 |
I've heard that the paint was the only difference. But if Bob Brozman says it's not, I would go for that. I've got a Triolian 37 and have asked the same question a few times. The answer I got was the paint. IP: Logged |
All times are PST (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
©1999,2000,2001,2002, 2003,2004,2005,2006 IGS. All Rights Reserved
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board