| Please CLICK HERE to go to the updated guitar forum. This version is no longer active as a discussion area, but is still available as a searchable archive. All user names and passwords have been integrated in the new forum |
|
Acoustic Guitar Forum
![]() The IGS Guitar Forum
![]() Recording to computer
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Recording to computer |
|
collinsc1 Member Posts: 50 From: Nashville, TN Registered: Oct 2001 |
I'm trying to do some very basic recording of my playing onto the computer - strictly for self-evaluation kind of stuff. I'm using a Sony stereo microphone (ECM-MS907) that they sell for MD recorders and plugging it into the mic input for the soundcard. Recording software is Musicmatch Jukebox. I tried it out last night and got a very "muddy" sound - bass seems heavy but indistinct and trebles are not as clean and sharp as what I hear from the actual guitar sound. Is this a question of mic placement, recording volume level (I have this set pretty high), etc., or am I asking too much from this setup? Would different software, such as Cakewalk or Cool Edit, help? Would I get better results recording into a MD recorder? I am considering one of these but wanted to try this cheaper option first. Thanks in advance for any help. Clay Collins [This message has been edited by collinsc1 (edited July 29, 2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Corn Dog Member Posts: 1765 From: Montclair, NJ USA Registered: Jan 2001 |
If you want, email me the file and I'll give you my opinion on what might be happening. IP: Logged |
|
crossrdblue Member ![]() Posts: 1078 From: Denver, CO Registered: Feb 2001 |
I am not sure about the computer problem, CornDog might be able to help, because to me your set up sounds fine - I use all of those tools, but I almost never record directly into the computer, b/c it usually sounds like you've described. I record to my MD, then record that into the computer - sounds excellant! Brad. IP: Logged |
|
Adrian Freed Member ![]() Posts: 2360 From: Berkeley, CA, USA Registered: Oct 2000 |
I think it may be a problem of impedence mismatch. There are lots of dfifferent kinds of mic inputs and different kinds of microphones. It is common for them to not match well. What I suggest is that you plug the Sony microphone into the minidisc and then use the minidiscs outputs (line outs or headphone out if you have to) into a line input of the PC. Put the minidisc on record/pause or even record onto a disc while you do the transfer.
Experiment with the room you are in. If you plan to add a lot of processing and reverb after the fact, you will want a room with lots of carpets and drapes and soft stuff around (e.g. bedroom). If you want to use the natural reverberation, find a room with a wooden floor and lots of complexity (i.e. alchoves, furtniture, decorations on the walls and ceiling etc.). Try to avoid any bare parallel walls. Reverb tends to make recordings sound better, but if you really want to do critical listening of your playing you will want to avoid it. [This message has been edited by Adrian Freed (edited July 29, 2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Finn Bjerke Member ![]() Posts: 2614 From: www.finnbjerke.dk Registered: Apr 2000 |
try microphone boost in windows mixer, itīs under "advanced" under the soundlevel knob for microphone. A good mic and a PC is a good tool for recording and should give good results. Dont forget that a lot of programmes can add compressor, reverb etc to the recording. IP: Logged |
|
Corn Dog Member Posts: 1765 From: Montclair, NJ USA Registered: Jan 2001 |
Finn has suggested what I think may be the problem. If you have your input set high in MusicMatch, say past 50%, your line or mic in is too low or not enabled. You may be boosting a weak input signal to distortion. I had this problem converting some records tracks to MP3s when I first started using the program. To check it, do this: 1. Double click on the speaker icon in your system tray (lower right box). 2. Select Options, then Properties in upper left. 3. In the Properties window select recording and then Ok. 4. Check the settings in this window and confirm that your input source is the one selected. That is, if you're using the Mic In, make sure that one is selected. Also confirm the physical connection to your computer. 5. Once you have everything properly selected, bring the level down a bit and record again. If this cleans it up then you're on to the nuances of micing that Adrian has suggested for capturing the best sound from the guitar/room you are recording. [This message has been edited by Corn Dog (edited July 29, 2003).] IP: Logged |
|
collinsc1 Member Posts: 50 From: Nashville, TN Registered: Oct 2001 |
Everyone, Thanks for all the feedback. I'll double-check my computer settings and play around with the mic placement to see if that helps. I did have the mic only about 8-10" away when I recorded last night. If I still have problems, I'll take you up on your offer to give it a listen, Corn Dog. Thanks again for all the ideas. Clay IP: Logged |
|
collinsc1 Member Posts: 50 From: Nashville, TN Registered: Oct 2001 |
I played around with some things last night and got much better sound quality by positioning the mic as Adrian suggested. The computer settings on the Windows mixer were all correct - mic-in for the source and the mic gain selected. The recorded volume still seemed very low, even with the mic-in level set around 80-90%. For playback, I had to turn all my volume controls way up just to hear it - this mainly affected the acoustic, not so much the vocals or my reso. Could this be related to the impedance mismatch that Adrian spoke of (although I'm not sure exactly what that means)? Also, can I expect better recording levels if I was recording to a minidisc with this mic? I don't want to go out and spend the $250 for one if the results aren't any better. Thanks again for all the help. Clay IP: Logged |
|
Jeffrey Sipress Member ![]() Posts: 1335 From: Santa Barbara, CA Registered: Nov 1999 |
Check the battery in the mic. IP: Logged |
|
Adrian Freed Member ![]() Posts: 2360 From: Berkeley, CA, USA Registered: Oct 2000 |
I have the same mic. I find the level too low for regular mic input on most computers. That's why I go through my minidisc and out again. I am just using it as a pre-amp. IP: Logged |
|
John B Member Posts: 1387 From: Registered: May 2000 |
Wow - I hadn't thought of going through the minidisc player as an amp. What happens if I'm using a stereo mic, yet the input is mono? IP: Logged |
|
Adrian Freed Member ![]() Posts: 2360 From: Berkeley, CA, USA Registered: Oct 2000 |
Pick a channel, any channel at all......
or put your minidisc in mono recording mode. IP: Logged |
|
collinsc1 Member Posts: 50 From: Nashville, TN Registered: Oct 2001 |
Adrian, I think I'm beginning to grasp this. If I understand you correctly, the mic I have used with a minidisc recorder should provide proper recording levels and sound quality. If I want to record to my computer, then I should record through the minidisc unit to transfer this effect to the computer recording. I guess I was just trying to cut too many corners and wound up with less than adequate performance. Thanks again for all the input. IP: Logged |
|
john_reeves Member Posts: 5 From: queensland Registered: Jul 2003 |
Clay, without spending too much money, there r a few options u could try. 1) try a different recording program, more professional Audio such as Audacity (free = http://audacity.sourceforge.net/about.php?lang=en) or fork out some $$ for Soundforge. 2) U may want to fool around with yr settings a bit, or adapt a cheap mixer....this will help with yr imput 3) Always 'normalise' yr recording once it is made, this is mandatory, otherwise the DAC ( digital to analogiue converter in yr sound card) which compresses the recorded audio will only give a limited quality. 4) try a direct pickup to audio in... 5) check the quality of yr sound card..some cheaper cards and cards for general games r not great for recording.... 6) always get a test level from yr microphone and normalise a test file to suss out the effectiveness or yr recording capabilities 7) recording direct to computers can be risky as its is easy to get audio artefacts from the amount of electrical interference in a computer system...mini disks, hard drive recorders etc tend to give a better non interference quality unless u invest in a really good recording card with external rack inputs etc .. cheeeeeeeeeers [This message has been edited by john_reeves (edited July 30, 2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Adrian Freed Member ![]() Posts: 2360 From: Berkeley, CA, USA Registered: Oct 2000 |
I agree with much of the above except the "normalize" suggestion. I don't have time before IGS to explain fully why, but digitally normalizing a signal inroduces noise. You want to get the levels right in the analog world first. IP: Logged |
|
Finn Bjerke Member ![]() Posts: 2614 From: www.finnbjerke.dk Registered: Apr 2000 |
To me it sounds as if the recording level on the mic could be improved by using the "boost option" on the mixer as descirbed above. Recording on a PC with a low recording level is not giving good results. Anyway I good er very good mic and a JoeMeek Compressor that I use as preamp. I like what I hear ! Still better recordings shows tghe aWfull truth : I am not a very good guitarist! But the recordings help me improve. I hope. 1) Have anyone tried using USB for mic connection instead of a soundcard? IP: Logged |
|
Corn Dog Member Posts: 1765 From: Montclair, NJ USA Registered: Jan 2001 |
I agree 100% with Adrian about the spartan use of normalization. It's the old garbage in garbage out concept. If your recording process is using only using a small percentage of the available bits (amplitude) as you capture it digitally, normalizing it will only make a louder partial recording. That is, if your signal is only using a fragment of the 24-bit signal available, say 6-bits worth, you just end up with a louder 6-bit wave. It won't sound like a full 24-bit captured signal because those details aren't there to begin with. And you'll probably get randomly generated noise added. Like with recording to tape, record so that you saturate and fill up the 24-bit signal by recording as close as possible to the peak (maximum amplitude). The challenge here, from my experience, is that digital clipping, as you exceed the maximum amplitude, is very harsh, and the threshold can be tough to find, depending on the tools you're using. Clipping is more forgiving, and sometimes desireable, on the analogue side due the slight natural compression that can occur. For both, trial and error with your setup and copious session notes will get you to the right levels for consistent good signal recordings. Back on topic, now that you've checked everything else, it seems like Adrian's pre-amp suggestion may be the cure here for your current setup. Finn, I come in via USB with my Aarvark USB3 24 bit A/D converter. For acoustic recording, I come in with two mics, one with a tube pre-amp, into my RNC775 compressor, which then feeds the Aardvark. I adjust levels on the tube pre-amp, the compressor, and the A/D converter. I do not make any adjustments in Cakewalk during the recording process, only on the mix down. Check out Resin8er's material on the IGS Sampler. These tracks were recorded here recently using this setup. Resin8er has a great ear and naturally EQ'ed himself as he played guitar and sang. He heard how he loaded the room and adjusted accordingly for a warm, full, and balanced signal. I didn't need to touch the mix at all, other than some panning. [This message has been edited by Corn Dog (edited July 31, 2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Steinar Gregertsen Member Posts: 3670 From: Norway Registered: Apr 2003 |
"A good not to expensive recording sound card instead of Soundblaster Live. Any recommendations?" Finn,- check out the Echo 'Mia' card, costs NOK 3.000- in Norway and that's not much more than the SB I think. [This message has been edited by Steinar Gregertsen (edited July 31, 2003).] IP: Logged |
|
Finn Bjerke Member ![]() Posts: 2614 From: www.finnbjerke.dk Registered: Apr 2000 |
This is very interesting. Converting from Analog to digital can be done by using a soundcard or an external converter it seems. Whats the pros and cons of those two solutions? Is external Converters used for portable PCīs and not For standard PCīs ?? Corndog, you menmtioned two micīs whatīs mic #2 doing for the saound and why use two? One mic is going thru compressor etc. what the other one doing then? (I might be daft here but eh.. Just curious) Also you mention USB3 that is new for me. USB2 Iīve heard of .. Is anyone using the internal (highlander) mic inside the guitar as a recordingdevice? Stainer: Thanks for advice on that soundcard, itīs more money than I have jsut now maybe Iīll get a used one. Soundblaster Live cost me 700 Kr what is better about the Echo card ? The conversion from analog to digital? IP: Logged |
All times are PST (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Đ1999,2000,2001,2002, 2003,2004,2005,2006 IGS. All Rights Reserved
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board