Please CLICK HERE to go to the updated guitar forum. This version is no longer active as a discussion area, but is still available as a searchable archive. All user names and passwords have been integrated in the new forum

  Acoustic Guitar Forum
  The IGS Guitar Forum
  Robert Johnson's recordings are 80% too fast (Page 3)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Robert Johnson's recordings are 80% too fast
mrmuzikhead
Member

Posts: 186
From: sarnia
Registered: Dec 2004
posted 03-10-2007 08:35     Click Here to See the Profile for mrmuzikhead   Click Here to Email mrmuzikhead     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
While reading this thread (for the first time) I can't help but think how things will be viewed 80 years from now? Did they use pitch correct here? Was this sampled? Did they really play that fast ? Was it sequenced? Edited? The bottom line will and should be, was it good music or not. The good stuff will stand the test of time. Mozart, Bach, and Beethoven all stood the test of time and they were "recorded" on paper. I'm seeing the music of the Beatles, Led Zepplin, Dylan and many others being enjoyed by new generations as we speak. Interesting topic tho. While it doesn't really interest me all that much, I still appreciate that there are people that do have the patience to look into these things. It's just not that important to me. RJ's work stands true at any speed.

IP: Logged

JiveTurkey
New Member

Posts: 3
From:
Registered: Mar 2007
posted 03-10-2007 12:35     Click Here to See the Profile for JiveTurkey     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm not an expert on the blues. However, I do know that some parts of North America used 25 cycle power until much later. So, it migth be good to check what cycle of power the area that these recordings were done used, before you start looking for 60Hz hum which isn't going to be there. If this is the case it would be some kind of 25Hz noise, which probably won't come through on an old 78.

Further, I have read about new techniques of getting quality recordings from old records where they are taking high resolution pictures and abstracting the sound from them. This way they can fix all the pop's and clicks by using photo software and gently smoothing over the small scratches. Does anyone know if this is being done for Robert Johnson recordings? or, any of the old blues guys for that matter? Now that would be very interesting to see what comes of it. We might find out a lot more about his playing with a very high quality recording.

JiveTurkey..

IP: Logged

Ricochet
Member

Posts: 895
From: Bristol, Tennessee, USA
Registered: Mar 2004
posted 03-10-2007 18:01     Click Here to See the Profile for Ricochet   Click Here to Email Ricochet     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
25 Hz power was pretty rare in the US by the late '30s. It hung on at the Niagara Falls power plant until pretty recently. There were areas in the U.S. with 50 Hz power as well. In the '30s there were still many rural areas with nominally 60 Hz power that wasn't closely frequency controlled. Laurens Hammond pushed power frequency standardization in the late '20s-early '30s by presenting power company executives with Hammond synchronous motor electric clocks. When they wondered why their clocks didn't keep time, the dependence of the clock on the power frequency was pointed out, and the bosses saw to it that the situation was fixed. (Hammond's organs that also rely on a synchronous motor were introduced in 1935.)

It's certainly possible that a nonstandard power frequency is responsible for the discrepancy. It shouldn't be too hard to find out what power frequency was in use when Mr. Johnson's recordings were made.

-- 
"A cheerful heart is good medicine."

IP: Logged

drdanbern
New Member

Posts: 1
From: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Registered: Jan 2008
posted 01-05-2008 06:20     Click Here to See the Profile for drdanbern   Click Here to Email drdanbern     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just finished reading this thread while listening to a bootleg entitled "Robert Johnson 32/20 Blues Speed Corrected." To my ear, most of the slowed-down versions sound much more real, while a few seem to drag too much. I wonder what is the origin of my bootleg, which I believe I received as a vine through the Yahoo Group All_Blues? My guess is this debate about RJ's music will go on for many years. Great posts from so many knowledgeable folks. Thanks a million!

IP: Logged


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 

All times are PST (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | IGS

©1999,2000,2001,2002, 2003,2004,2005,2006 IGS. All Rights Reserved

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board