| Please CLICK HERE to go to the updated guitar forum. This version is no longer active as a discussion area, but is still available as a searchable archive. All user names and passwords have been integrated in the new forum |
|
Acoustic Guitar Forum
![]() The IGS Guitar Forum
![]() I cut holes in my Seagull with powertools this morning...on purpose!
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: I cut holes in my Seagull with powertools this morning...on purpose! |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
Hi all... A discussion in another group on adding Soundports to guitars started me thinking about altering my Seagull S-6 Cedar - which is a Pawn Shop Rescue and my RV guitar. I'd like to be able to practice when my wife takes her turns driving in the RV, and roads can be noisy. Chatted via e-mail with Tim McKnight (a luthier who frequently builds sound ports on his acoustic guitars) yesterday a bit, and this morning a student cancelled so I dug in. I play in a neck up position so I sat down and held the guitar before beginning, and determined where the additional ''port'' would reach my ear(s) best. Didn't have the cutting bit Tim specified, so I double masked the area, marked the approximate shape, drilled out the corners, and then drilled smaller holes to ''connect the dots''. I played it and decided to enlarge it twice during the process - which was better than going too big first and trying to fill the hole. Sanded it to size with my dremmel tool, and vacuumed it out. Hand sanded it smooth, and polished the raw edges with superglue. Then I ''stained'' it with a Brown Sharpie pen. Results... Here are some pics which include some familiar objects for scale... This is the first soundport I've played that I hear well (because of my playing neck up). Fun project...once is enough (the Olson, Bashkin and Kronbauer are a safe distance from my tools.) Larry J [This message has been edited by ljguitar (edited 02-27-2006).] IP: Logged |
|
wcmartin Member Posts: 373 From: Charlotte, NC, USA Registered: Sep 2004 |
Wow, I'd say you have balls or a lot of money. I wouldn't do that to my nice Seagull S-6 Plus, I think it sounds great just as it is. Now, maybe on my old Fender Gemini or something similar. [This message has been edited by wcmartin (edited 02-27-2006).] IP: Logged |
|
Jack Cook Member Posts: 343 From: Cape Cod, MA, USA Registered: Sep 2003 |
Holy Moley. The thought of it scares me! Looks good, though. I've seen guitars with soundports like that but never played one. Does it affect the sound at all for the listener? That is, is the overall tone of the guitar the same, or changed? And what about dynamics on the listener's side also? I think Grit Laskin (Canadian luthier) makes a guitar with a soundport that has a little door you can open and close. Jack IP: Logged |
|
GotDemBlues Member Posts: 1232 From: Cave Creek, AZ, USA Registered: Mar 2003 |
Wow indeed. IP: Logged |
|
Pat Daley Member Posts: 439 From: Newburgh, NY Registered: Feb 2003 |
very impressive lj!! I just borrowed a guitar with sound ports - I'm sold. My first impression was it was as if hearing someone in front of me play the guitar. IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: Hi Jack... On mine, and this was purely for fun and hearing a bit better when I'm practicing in the RV during my wife's turns to drive, it really gives a volume boost to the person playing it without taking any volume away from the guitar. It didn't affect the tone. Tim McKnight had told me the closer the hole is situated to the neck, the less the bass is likely to be affected. I really took my time, and made sure I understood the process before beginning. I had e-mailed Tim McKnight and we had discussed where to locate it for my style. He put a great detail sheet out on how to do this a few weeks back in a group I frequent (I'll put them at the end of this post). It and his advice helped me immensely. I really went slow and made sure I paid attention. Took less than 45 minutes total. You asked about the listeners perspective several times, and I doubt the listeners will ever notice it at all. Volume, dynamics, projection and sustain are unaffected. Here are Tim's instructions...(as if you are going to carve holes in your objects of affection!). Larry J -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- Sound port installation instructions: List of material: Tape the area off with two layers of masking tape. Be generous so you don't risk scratching the surrounding finished area around the port. Look inside your guitar and see if there are any internal side braces. If so, transfer the brace locations onto the outside on the masking tape. This is the area that your sound hole must be located as you don't want to sever a brace. Stay well below the top and back kerfed linings too. Draw out the port shape on the masking tape. Smooth designs seem to produce a better tone. I use a port roughly the size of a Large Egg. Use the Dremmel , router base and down cut spiral cutting bit. Stay 1/16" inside of the line and cut the hole out. Put the sanding drum in the Dremmel and now sand to the finished shape outline. Use 180 sandpaper and round over the internal and external edges of the hole. Progress to 220 and finish with 320. Be very careful NOT to sand the finish on the exterior of the guitar. Coat the edge of the hole with superglue. It will dry hard and shiny. Use the edge of the brush to apply the glue and make a circle around the freshly sanded edge. Remove masking tape. If the glue is rough (usually it isn't) you can smooth with 600 wet or dry sandpaper and then buff. Get a glass of iced tea, kick back on the couch and let me know how big your smile is when you first hear the port. Tim… ©Tim McKnight 2005 [This message has been edited by ljguitar (edited 02-27-2006).] IP: Logged |
|
FretMonkey Member Posts: 56 From: Canada Registered: Aug 2005 |
That is wicked - in the last week or two I have been thinking of doing that to my Seagull Artist! I'm inspired! Nice job! FM IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: Hi FM... Larry J
IP: Logged |
|
eskimo Member Posts: 3519 From: Midwest Registered: Feb 2004 |
That's very cool. It's like on a Nat w/ all the bass coming out of the top f-hole at the player - but it's not the same sound that the listener is getting. I do think Seagulls are one of the best guitars out there for the money so that's a perfect guitar to do that to. Elderly has had a lot of very recent Seagull's on their "used, As-IS" list lately however, w/ a whole lot of things wrong w/ them like neck sets ! Ouch. Look 'em over good before ya buy... IP: Logged |
|
Tim Mitchell Member Posts: 1605 From: Nyack,NY USA Registered: Nov 2000 |
It funny, before you posted the parts list, I was thinking....that looks like a job for my dremel! IP: Logged |
|
John B Member Posts: 1387 From: Registered: May 2000 |
Here are some pics of soundports in the guitar I built with Harry Fleishman: I can't tell you if it makes a difference, because the guitar was designed with them from the ground up. However, I can tell you that my wife usually sits to the left of me in the living room - unless I'm playing this guitar. IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: Hi John, Do you have pictures of the guitar now that it is finished?
quote: Hi E...
[This message has been edited by ljguitar (edited 02-27-2006).] IP: Logged |
|
Duke Member Posts: 534 From: fort wayne, IN Registered: Aug 2004 |
Very interesting, thanks for posting this Larry. So if one takes this to its logical conclusion, would you say that the ultimate practice guitar (ie one that gives the player's ear the fullest sound) would consist of a solid top with no soundhole whatsoever, and one or two larger ports on the side facing up? Would the complete elimination of the soundhole allow for entirely different characteristics in the vibration (and bracing possibilities) of the top? In theory, it would seem that a side port would result in some low/mid tone reduction coming out of the front. Working in reverse, I know that if you completely block the soundhole, the treble sounds pretty much the same, the mids are reduced and the bass is downright muffled sounding. Assuming the sound generated inside the guitar is consistent, additional soundholes would seem to allow that fixed amount of sound more exit points. Which would seem to imply that adding one would result in less coming out the other. Really fascinating to ponder. Seems like an extension of the theories Loar introduced with his post-Gibson archtops (Vivi-tone?) where he put the f-holes on the back. IP: Logged |
|
John B Member Posts: 1387 From: Registered: May 2000 |
Duke, You're onto something (not "on something"). Keep in mind the Vivi-Tones were designed with the backs as soundboards as well (carved spruce back) - so both the top and the back would be working in concert to produce sound. A nice discussion and great pictures are here; one for sale is on this page (page down to item VT-00023). If I could have figured out how to swing either one, I would have. Here's a Boaz Elkayam "Flamenca Negra" with a side soundhole/soundport and no soundhole in the top. Page down on this page to the 6th guitar down to see how much it costs.
[This message has been edited by John B (edited 02-28-2006).] IP: Logged |
|
John B Member Posts: 1387 From: Registered: May 2000 |
P.S. Larry, I'll try to see if I have any pics of the guitar fully assembled; if not, I've got some pre-finish shots (or I can take some new pictures). IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: Hi Duke, We are having fun walking around while the player plays and listening etc. It's an amazing thing. Larry J
IP: Logged |
|
John B Member Posts: 1387 From: Registered: May 2000 |
Some posts on another forum dealing with soundports (look for posts from Al Carruth and Tim McKnight): http://www.acousticguitar.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=021455#000008 http://www.acousticguitar.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=022440#000004 Facinating stuff. Sure, it doesn't help me play any better, but it's fun to ask "why" or "why not" sometimes. IP: Logged |
|
DiegoMoon Member Posts: 225 From: New Jersey Registered: Feb 2006 |
Take a look at the guitar in this auction on eBay. I hope I did that link right. If not search for auction number 7393790786. This is a Charleston Guitar that was built by a luthier named Magnus Charleston that worked on this concept from the late 20's until he died in the early 80's. That big old vent on the back actually gives the player a totally different perspective on the sound that the guitar is making. [This message has been edited by DiegoMoon (edited 02-28-2006).] [This message has been edited by DiegoMoon (edited 02-28-2006).] IP: Logged |
|
daveh222 Member Posts: 110 From: Oregon Registered: May 2004 |
As soon as I get my dado blades rigged up on my skill saw I can take a run at my Martin OM28. I hear aged Rosewood responds well to crude power tools. I guess I'll just stick the neck in my machinist vice, crank it down real tight, and power up. I figure I can just calk up any extra saw kerfs and chips. Okay, so it was a joke. Tuned ports make sense, high end hi-fi speaker design sure makes use the concept. I just wouldn't have the guts to experiment on my guitars. Thanks for the details. -Dave IP: Logged |
|
DiegoMoon Member Posts: 225 From: New Jersey Registered: Feb 2006 |
I think the tuned port concept on speaker design is a little different, although it might be interesting to build a bass using the same concept as a Klipsch corner horn. IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: Hi DMoon... Similar Different A traditional speaker housing has 6 rigid planes to channel sound while the cone is flexible. An acoustic guitar has three planes...front (top), back, side (a continuous single plane). In a speaker, all sides are rigid. On a guitar, two are flexible - top and back. And one is sympathetic to the opposite. When the guitar's top vibrates, the soundwaves travel inward to the back which sympathetically vibrates and resonates (in solid guitars better than laminate) and reflects - and part of the sound travels out the back of the guitar. So sound is produced partly by reflection and partly by vibration. The guitar has to be built with sustain in mind. So the guitar's ''enclosure'' has to withstand the tension from the strings, pressure of strumming or picking, and transfer it into reflection, projection, vibration, sustain, and tone. Quite a different set of capabilities than we ask of a speaker enclosure. There are structural issues with cutting additional ports into instruments as well. Some of the tone is produced by active surfaces, so cutting holes in the top or back will affect tone more than cutting them in the side - which is rigid and doesn't contribute much to the ''resonating'' sound reproducing parts of the guitar. Just some thoughts... Larry J
IP: Logged |
|
DiegoMoon Member Posts: 225 From: New Jersey Registered: Feb 2006 |
Actually I would think that a resonator guitar operates along the same principle as a speaker enclosure. IP: Logged |
|
Duke Member Posts: 534 From: fort wayne, IN Registered: Aug 2004 |
And going back to my high school motorhead days, you could increase horsepower by smoothing and and polishing the manifold/head ports - the idea being that smooth polished curves allow the fuel mixture to flow more freely than sharp angles and rough surfaces. So perhaps the bowl-back shape of the oft-maligned Ovations might have some merit in this particular area, versus the traditional right angles of the side to top/back joints? Theoretically, of course. I love rabbit holes! IP: Logged |
|
paulm Member Posts: 49 From: Registered: Feb 2006 |
wow, I think I would have bought a quieter rv. You must have a gasser. try a diesel pusher and save your guitars. good job though IP: Logged |
|
simonjandrews Member Posts: 84 From: England Registered: Mar 2005 |
well aint that a fine mess you got yourself into.I'd say you've just about made a cock of that. IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: HI paulm... It is a fun project, and after the first road trip I'll know how much it helped. Thanks for responding. Larry J
IP: Logged |
|
tordoc Member Posts: 80 From: Belle Harbor, NY USA Registered: Aug 2005 |
My wife has this port on her Buscarino Grand Cabaret. It makes a major difference to the player. Looks right purty too... IP: Logged |
|
~(,o)===::: Member Posts: 24 From: Registered: Aug 2005 |
Interesting topic. I was thinking about removing my Fishman board out of my guitar are replacing it with a port. The guitar sound really nice with the Fishman flipped open in the battery changing position. I would reshape the hole so that is is more oval then make some nice pieces of wood to lay around the hole and finish it out. I have a Highlander ready to go it. Jim IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: Simply beautiful... Thanks for posting the pic. Larry J IP: Logged |
|
ljguitar Member Posts: 615 From: Wyoming Registered: Nov 2004 |
quote: Hi Jim... According to Tim McKnight, the hole would be so large as to create tone issues if left the size it is without electronics. We routinely joke about cup holders, pick pouches and other things which could be stored there. He even contemplated a leather sliding door. He finally settled on the idea of a wooden plate...I think. Larry J
IP: Logged |
All times are PST (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
©1999,2000,2001,2002, 2003,2004,2005,2006 IGS. All Rights Reserved
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board